Hudson v. Attorney General for the State of Minnesota et al
| Jose Montrell Hudson |
| Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, The and Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, The |
| 0:2022cv01997 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(ABR) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 9/7/2022.(RMM)
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jose Montrell Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ACH) Document QC'd on 10/5/2022 (MTB). |
| Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Jose Montrell Hudson (JGK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Attorney General for the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, The, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, The filed by Jose Montrell Hudson. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
