Broussard v. United States of America et al
| Aaron Rhy Broussard |
| United States of America, Sheriff Joel L. Brott, Commander Brian Frank, Sherburne County Jail, Susan Richard Nelson, Thomas M. Hollenhorst, Melinda A. Williams, Charles J. Novats, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Marshall Service |
| 0:2022cv02004 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MANDATE of USCA (electronic copy) as to #9 Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 12
USCA JUDGMENT (electronic copy) as to #9 Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. Petition for writ of mandamus has been considered by the court and is denied. Mandate shall issue forthwith. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (KNK) Modified text on 8/30/2022 (MKB).
|
|
Filing 11
USCA Case Number 22-2783 for #9 Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 10
TRANSMITTAL OF APPEAL LETTER TO U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, 8TH CIRCUIT, Re: Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit #9 . (KNK)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO 8TH CIRCUIT as to #7 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for TRO, #8 Judgment, by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KNK)
|
|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Appeal Packet, #2 Civil Notice - appeal)(KNK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and #5 Motion for TRO. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard #1 is DENIED. 2. Broussard's motion for a temporary injunction #4 is DENIED. 3. Broussard's motion for a temporary restraining order #5 is DENIED. 4. This matter is DISMISSED. 5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED that any documents submitted by Broussard seeking to commence a new action attacking the legality of his criminal prosecution, conviction, or sentence must be returned to Broussard without being filed. This restriction will expire when the Eighth Circuit issues its mandate after disposing of Broussard's appeal of his sentencing judgment. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 8/16/2022. (CLG)
|
|
Filing 6
RECEIPT number 44641114959 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Aaron Broussard. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/19/2022 (MTB).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Temporary Injunction - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/19/2022 (MTB).
|
|
Filing 3
AFFIDAVIT of Aaron Rhy Broussard re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Aaron Rhy Broussard. (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/19/2022 (MTB).
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard.(JGK) Document QC'd on 8/19/2022 (MTB).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 4-114959) filed by Aaron Rhy Broussard. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (JGK) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/15/2022: #1 Envelope) (JGK). Document QC'd on 8/19/2022 (MTB).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
