Cantwell v. 3M Company,et al
Plaintiff: Jay S. Cantwell
Defendant: 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Case Number: 0:2022cv02024
Filed: August 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
2 Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Thomas L Peterson for Jay S. Cantwell. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/19/2022. (KMO)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-2024 (NEB/DTS). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/18/2022.(KNK)
August 17, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Brown, Jeffrey)
August 17, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, 3M Innovative Properties Company. (KNK)
August 17, 2022 Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd, 4th - Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-2024 (NEB/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (KNK)
August 17, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, filed by 3M Company, a Delaware Corporation, 3M Innovative Properties Company, a Delaware corporation filed by Jay S. Cantwell. (Brown, Jeffrey)
August 17, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Thomas L. Peterson. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9703886 filed by Jay S. Cantwell. (Brown, Jeffrey)
August 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number BMNDC-9703808) filed by Jay S. Cantwell. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR,TO BE REFILED: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex. 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brown, Jeffrey) Modified text on 8/17/2022 (KNK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cantwell v. 3M Company,et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay S. Cantwell
Represented By: Jeffrey Carl Brown
Represented By: Thomas L Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Innovative Properties Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?