Cherico v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Catherine Cherico |
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
0:2022cv02043 |
August 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David T Schultz |
Eric C Tostrud |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (ABR) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Massachusetts Institute of Technology. filed by Catherine Cherico. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Klotzbuecher, Mark) Modified text on 10/14/2022 (ABR). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Prudential Insurance Company of America. (CLK) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David S. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-2043 ECT/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Prudential Insurance Company of America (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9709275) filed by Catherine Cherico. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Klotzbuecher, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.