Beauregard v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff: Ashley Beauregard
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 0:2022cv02070
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Dulce J Foster
Referring Judge: Katherine M Menendez
2 Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2022 Filing 7 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, this case is reassigned to her. Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz is no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-2070 KMM/DJF. Please use this case number for all subsequent filings. Scheduling orders entered before this case was reassigned will remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. If a previously scheduled proceeding conflicts with an event already on Magistrate Judge Foster's schedule, the parties will be contacted, and a new date and time agreed upon. Magistrate Judge Foster's #practice pointers are available on the Court's website. Please contact Magistrate Judge Foster's chambers, at 651-848-1900, for scheduling or other matters. (kt)
September 16, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Ashley Beauregard. Prudential Insurance Company of America waiver sent on 9/2/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. (Karrer, Brenna)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Brenna Karrer for Ashley Beauregard. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/1/2022. (KMO)
August 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brenna Karrer. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9734082 filed by Ashley Beauregard. (Schmoll, Zachary)
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Prudential Insurance Company of America. (MKB)
August 24, 2022 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-2070 (KMM/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB)
August 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Prudential Insurance Company of America (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9717917) filed by Ashley Beauregard. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Karrer, Brenna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beauregard v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Beauregard
Represented By: Zachary Schmoll
Represented By: Brenna Karrer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?