Zins v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Plaintiff: David Zins
Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing LLC and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Case Number: 0:2022cv02153
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: John R Tunheim
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by David Zins. Jointly Signed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC.(Drewes, Jonathan)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/24/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 10/31/2022 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 9/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
September 2, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Court, Benjamin)
September 2, 2022 Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Court, Benjamin)
September 2, 2022 Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-2153 JRT/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK)
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR, TO BE REFILED. RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Court, Benjamin) Modified text on 9/2/2022 (KNK).
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Tenth Judicial District, case number 82-cv-22-3671 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9737337) filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Court, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zins v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Zins
Represented By: Jonathan L R Drewes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Represented By: Benjamin J Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Represented By: Benjamin J Court
Represented By: Kevin P. Kitchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?