Hunter v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc
| Tony Hunter |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc |
| 0:2022cv02319 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Tony N Leung |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(ACH) |
Filing 10
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 11/16/2022.(las)
|
| Filing 9 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: Pursuant to #8 Stipulation of Dismissal, the Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2022 before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung is hereby CANCELLED. (HAM) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Experian by Tony Hunter. Jointly Signed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Smith, Catrina) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Tony Hunter. Jointly Signed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Smith, Catrina) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Lacy, Samuel) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2022 at 09:30 AM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Lacy, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Lacy, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-2319 (DWF/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9777089) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lacy, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunter v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tony Hunter | |
| Represented By: | Catrina Eom Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Lewis Lacy |
| Represented By: | Trevor Parkes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
