Cincinnati Insurance Company, The v. J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
| The Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Insurance Company, The |
| J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC, Doran Construction Company, LLC, Doran Canterbury I, LLC, John Doe Insurance Companies, Jane Doe Tenants 1-320 and Jane Doe |
| 0:2022cv02536 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 09:00 AM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM)
|
|
Filing 10
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2023 at 09:00 AM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM) Modified text on 11/23/2022 (CLK).
|
| Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc.. (Bohnsack, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC. (Bohnsack, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Rowley, Michael) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc. served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Rowley, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Doran Canterbury I, LLC, Doran Construction Company, LLC, J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Jane Doe Tenants 1-320, John Doe Insurance Companies, Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC. (MTB) |
| Filing 4 FILED IN ERROR. DOCUMENT NOT ATTACHED//Summons Issued as to Doran Canterbury I, LLC, Doran Construction Company, LLC, J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Jane Doe, John Doe Insurance Companies, Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC. (MTB) Modified text on 10/13/2022 (MTB). |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-02536 KMM/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MTB) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Rowley, Michael) Modified text on 10/13/2022 (ABR). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against Doran Canterbury I, LLC, Doran Construction Company, LLC, J-Berd Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Jane Doe Tenants 1-320, John Doe Insurance Companies, Security Fire Sprinkler, LLC (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9818822) filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex. A, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Rowley, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
