Perkins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Monisha Perkins |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2022cv02707 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Monisha Perkins (Smith, Catrina) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement with Experian by Monisha Perkins (Smith, Catrina) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. answer due 11/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 11/3/2022. (JLB)
|
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Bunge-Bollman, Chelsea) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Bunge-Bollman, Chelsea) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Bunge-Bollman, Chelsea) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Bunge-Bollman, Chelsea) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 22-cv-2707 WMW/LIB.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial District for the State of Minnesota, Hennepin County (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9855242) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bunge-Bollman, Chelsea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perkins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monisha Perkins | |
| Represented By: | Catrina Eom Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Chelsea Bunge-Bollman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
