Sellers v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff: Deana Sellers
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Case Number: 0:2022cv02827
Filed: November 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (Text-Only) ORDER Cancelling Deadline & Hearing. Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/22 is CANCELLED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 12/20/2022. (TJB)
December 20, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement with Defendant by Deana Sellers (Anderson, Timothy)
December 15, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Deana Sellers. Jointly Signed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Anderson, Timothy)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 12/13/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/13/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TJB)
November 10, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions Inc.. (Zurn, Henry)
November 4, 2022 Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-2827 NEB/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH)
November 3, 2022 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Zurn, Henry)
November 3, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9871875) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Summons, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service) (Zurn, Henry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellers v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deana Sellers
Represented By: Timothy S Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Henry Zurn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Represented By: Henry Zurn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?