Kamprud et al v. Blinken et al
| Jennifer Kamprud and Mohamed Ahmed Abdulminim |
| Antony Blinken and Nicole Shampaine |
| 0:2022cv02845 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| John F Docherty |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Draisey, Lucas) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline by Antony Blinken, Nicole Shampaine. Jointly Signed by Jennifer Kamprud and Mohamed Ahmed Abdulminim. (Draisey, Lucas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucas B. Draisey on behalf of Antony Blinken, Nicole Shampaine. (Draisey, Lucas) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Nicole Shampaine. (kt) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-2845 MJD/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Nicole Shampaine (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9876557) filed by Jennifer Kamprud, Ahmed Abdulminim. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
