Huntington National Bank v. Lumack Bellot Construction et al
| Huntington National Bank |
| Lumack Bellot Construction and Jonathan Durr |
| 0:2022cv02951 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Michael J Davis |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Huntington National Bank. Jonathan Durr served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Schroeder, Mark) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jonathan Durr, Lumack Bellot Construction. (MKB) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 22-cv-2951 (MJD/LIB).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Huntington National Bank. (Schroeder, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jonathan Durr, Lumack Bellot Construction (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9905630) filed by Huntington National Bank. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schroeder, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
