Farnam Street Financial, Inc. v. Bleu Tech Enterprises, Inc.
| Farnam Street Financial Inc and Farnam Street Financial, Inc. |
| Bleu Tech Enterprises, Inc. |
| 0:2022cv02961 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Farnam Street Financial, Inc.. Bleu Tech Enterprises, Inc. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. (Ashfield, Phillip) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bleu Tech Enterprises, Inc. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-2961 (KMM/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Farnam Street Financial Inc. (Kitchen, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bleu Tech Enterprises, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9909874) filed by Farnam Street Financial Inc. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kitchen, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
