Valenzuela v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Susana Valenzuela |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2022cv02976 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/4/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 4/4/2023. Fact Discovery due by 7/10/2023. Motions (non-disp) due 7/10/2023. Expert Discovery due by 10/2/2023. Motions (disp) due by 12/4/2023. Ready for trial due by 3/4/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/5/2023.(TJS)
|
| Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty: Pretrial Conference held on 1/5/2023. Status conference set for 4/6/2023 at 9 AM via Zoom (audio-only). (TJS) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Susana Valenzuela. Jointly Signed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Smith, Catrina) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/29/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/5/2023 at 10:00 AM in Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 12/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Rule 26(f) Template)(MME)
|
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Parkes, Trevor) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Parkes, Trevor) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-2976 (JRT/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (KNK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9915228) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Parkes, Trevor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valenzuela v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susana Valenzuela | |
| Represented By: | Catrina Eom Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Trevor Parkes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
