Fonkwa v. Swanson et al
| Bernard Nkwango Fonkwa |
| Trina M. Swanson, David Douglas, Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 0:2022cv02991 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of David Douglas, Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Trina M. Swanson. (Hoskins, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Douglas, Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Trina M. Swanson. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-2991 (DWF/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9919035) filed by Bernard Nkwango Fonkwa. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Bryan, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
