Sens et al v. Hutchinson et al
| Eleonore Sens, Chandan Khanna and Robin Legrand |
| David Hutchinson, Officers John Does 1-4 and John Does 1-4 |
| 0:2022cv03009 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Eleonore Sens, Robin Legrand, Chandan Khanna. David Hutchinson waiver sent on 12/9/2022, answer due 2/7/2023. (Riach, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah C S McLaren on behalf of David Hutchinson. (McLaren, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 4
Amended Summons Issued as to John Does 1-4. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to John Does 1-4, David Hutchinson. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 2
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd, 4th - Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-3009 (DWF/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (KNK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9925978) filed by Eleonore Sens, Robin Legrand, Chandan Khanna. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Riach, Kevin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
