Phylon v. Garland et al
Hanson Phylon |
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae Johnson, Marcos Charles, Eric Holien and Tae D. Johnson |
0:2022cv03038 |
December 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David S Doty |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY. Action dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (DLO) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hanson Phylon (Bruning, John) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Marcos Charles, Merrick B. Garland, Eric Holien, Tae D. Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-3038 (DSD/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $ 5, receipt number AMNDC-9937574) filed by Hanson Phylon. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit(s) Ex. A, #3 Exhibit(s) Ex. B, #4 Exhibit(s) Ex. C, #5 Exhibit(s) Ex. D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bruning, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.