Goecke v. 3M Company
| Richard R Goecke and Richard R. Goecke |
| 3M Company |
| 0:2022cv03087 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report and Confidential Letters due by 3/8/2023. Pretrial Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2023 at 09:00 AM by Zoom video (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 2/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(f) Report Template, #2 Consent Form)(LNP)
|
| Filing 12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for 3M Company. (Boone, Nathan) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - EEOC Notice and Charge) (Boone, Nathan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard R. Goecke. 3M Company served on 1/13/2023, answer due 2/3/2023. (Anderson, Lexis) |
|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Lexis Anderson for Richard R. Goecke. Approved by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 12/21/2022. (KMO)
|
|
Filing 8
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Robert E Barnes for Richard R. Goecke. Approved by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 12/20/2022. (KMO)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-3087 KMM/DJF. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 12/16/2022.(ACH)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lexis Anderson. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9951589 filed by Richard R. Goecke. (White, Francis) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Robert Barnes. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9951559 filed by Richard R. Goecke. (White, Francis) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Robert Barnes, Lexis Anderson as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (ACH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-3087 KMM/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9951010) filed by Richard R Goecke. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s)) (White, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
