Wogbah et al v. U.S. Bancorp
Plaintiff: Peter Wogbah and Peter Renewal, LLC
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp doing business as U.S. Bank
Case Number: 0:2022cv03133
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David T Schultz
Referring Judge: Wilhelmina M Wright
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2023 Filing 7 EXHIBIT Summons and Complaint re #6 Order to Party File Document/Respond to Court filed by U.S. Bancorp. (Wilk, David)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 1/9/2023.(TJB)
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE)
December 21, 2022 Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-3133 WMW/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK)
December 21, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by U.S. Bancorp d/b/a U.S. Bank. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Wilk, David)
December 21, 2022 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for U.S. Bancorp d/b/a U.S. Bank. (Wilk, David)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court, case number Unknown (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9964601) filed by U.S. Bancorp d/b/a U.S. Bank. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) 2 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wilk, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wogbah et al v. U.S. Bancorp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Wogbah
Represented By: Richard W Hechter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Renewal, LLC
Represented By: Richard W Hechter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bancorp doing business as U.S. Bank
Represented By: Nicholas Andrew Rauch
Represented By: Ryan Deschene
Represented By: David M Wilk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?