Mbakop v. Mayorkas et al
| Richard Mbakop |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Jaddou, Ken Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Kenneth Madsen |
| 0:2022cv03171 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucas B. Draisey on behalf of Ur Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Draisey, Lucas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-3171 (ECT/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 FILED IN ERROR: MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney John Ting. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9968028 filed by Richard Mbakop. (Prokosch, Marc) Modified text on 12/28/2022 (KMO). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, Ken Madsen, Alejandro Mayorkas (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9968020) filed by Richard Mbakop. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
