Berg v. BBH Management Company, LLC et al
Barbara J. Berg |
BBH Management Company, LLC and Hartman-Greenbrier LLC |
0:2023cv00059 |
January 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Michael J Davis |
David T Schultz |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING LR 5.6. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s)) (TJB) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery due by 8/31/2023. Motions (non-disp) due 8/31/2023. Motions (disp) due by 11/30/2023. Ready for trial due by 4/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 2/22/2023. (TJB) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only) ORDER Cancelling Deadline & Hearing. Pretrial conference set for 2/14/23 is cancelled. A scheduling order will issue. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 2/8/2023. (TJB) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE as CO-COUNSEL for Barbara J. Berg. (Jelinek, Laura) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by BBH Management Company, LLC, Hartman-Greenbrier LLC. Jointly Signed by Barbara J. Berg, BBH Management Company, LLC, and Hartman-Greenbrier, LLC.(Schultz, Samuel) |
Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 2/7/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/7/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 2/14/2023 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 1/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TJB) |
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Hartman-Greenbrier LLC. (Schultz, Samuel) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for BBH Management Company, LLC. (Schultz, Samuel) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by BBH Management Company, LLC, Hartman-Greenbrier LLC. (Schultz, Samuel) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Jesse Smith as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMG) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd/4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 23-cv-59 MJD/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ramsey, case number 62-CV-22-6593 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9994548) filed by Hartman-Greenbrier LLC, BBH Management Company, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) B-Notice of Filing Notice of Removal , #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schultz, Samuel) Modified text on 1/9/2023 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.