Reitz et al v. Blinken
Plaintiff: Kathleen Li Reitz and Yue Li
Defendant: Antony J. Blinken
Case Number: 0:2023cv00213
Filed: January 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam J Hoskins on behalf of Antony J. Blinken. (Hoskins, Adam)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jesse Matthew Bless for Yue Li and Kathleen Li Reitz. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 2/2/2023. (KMO)
February 1, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Kathleen Li Reitz, Yue Li. Antony J. Blinken served on 2/1/2023, answer due 4/3/2023. (Bloomquist, Mark)
February 1, 2023 Filing 5 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. TO BE REFILED//SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kathleen Li Reitz, Yue Li. Antony J. Blinken served on 2/1/2023, answer due 2/22/2023. (Bloomquist, Mark) Modified text on 2/1/2023 (ACH).
January 30, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jesse M. Bless. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10041566 filed by Yue Li, Kathleen Li Reitz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Affidavit of Proposed Admittee Jesse Bless, #2 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Good Standing of Jesse Bless)(Bloomquist, Mark)
January 27, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony J. Blinken. (ABR)
January 27, 2023 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-213 (NEB/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR)
January 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony J. Blinken (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10039167) filed by Kathleen Li Reitz, Yue Li. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Approval of Visa, #2 Exhibit(s) 2022 04 08 Gmail Attachment - Administrative processing 221G Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bloomquist, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reitz et al v. Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Li Reitz
Represented By: Mark A Bloomquist
Represented By: Jesse Matthew Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yue Li
Represented By: Mark A Bloomquist
Represented By: Jesse Matthew Bless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony J. Blinken
Represented By: Adam J Hoskins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?