DeConinck v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Blake DeConinck |
Pentagon Federal Credit Union |
0:2023cv00215 |
January 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Nicholas M. H. Reddick for Pentagon Federal Credit Union; granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Meryl Conant Governski for Pentagon Federal Credit Union. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 3/7/2023. (KMO) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Meryl Governski. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10113842 filed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Sherman, Eric) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Nicholas Reddick. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10113832 filed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Sherman, Eric) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric R. Sherman on behalf of Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Sherman, Eric) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Plaintiff's Complaint Pentagon Federal Credit Union response due 4/17/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 2/22/2023. (TMA) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Nicholas Reddick, Meryl Governski as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. cc: Reddick, Governski. (MTB) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, #6 Stipulation. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Blake DeConinck.(Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Blake DeConinck. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Blake DeConinck. Jointly Signed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Nordin on behalf of Blake DeConinck. (Nordin, Daniel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Blake DeConinck. Pentagon Federal Credit Union served on 1/31/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. (Williams, Amanda) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (kt) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-215 NEB/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pentagon Federal Credit Union (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10039519) filed by Blake DeConinck. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.