Dalton v. CVS Health Corporation
| Julie Dalton |
| CVS Health Corporation |
| 0:2023cv00442 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Paul A Magnuson |
| David T Schultz |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER on #8 Stipulation. Answer due 5/8/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/28/2023. (TJB)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Olson, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by CVS Health Corporation. Jointly Signed by Julie Dalton. (Olson, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julie Dalton. CVS Health Corporation served on 3/2/2023, answer due 3/23/2023. (Michenfelder, Patrick) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER in re Dispositive Motion Practice in cases assigned to The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson.
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CVS Health Corporation. (MTB) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT DUE TO CASE ASSIGNMENT ERROR. This case is reassigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per Civil (3rd/4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright, Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-00442 PAM/DTS. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. (MTB) Modified text on 2/23/2023 (MTB). |
| NOTICE OF DOCKETING CORRECTION for #3 Summons Issued: Marked "Filed in Error". Summons refiled at #5 with new case number. (MTB) |
| Filing 3 FILED IN ERROR. REFILED See #5 . Summons Issued as to CVS Health Corporation. (MTB) Modified text on 2/23/2023 (MTB). |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd/4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 23-cv-00442 WMW/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MTB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CVS Health Corporation (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10093523) filed by Julie Dalton. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Michenfelder, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dalton v. CVS Health Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julie Dalton | |
| Represented By: | Jason D Gustafson |
| Represented By: | Chad Throndset |
| Represented By: | Patrick W Michenfelder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CVS Health Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Daniel R Olson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
