Cement Masons, Plasterers and Shophands Service Corporation v. Erickson Builders & Co. Inc. et al
Cement Masons, Plasterers and Shophands Service Corporation |
Erickson Builders & Co. Inc. and Ryan Erickson, Sr. |
0:2023cv00519 |
March 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Tony N Leung |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cement Masons, Plasterers and Shophands Service Corporation. Ryan Erickson, Sr served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023; Erickson Builders & Co. Inc. served on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Cefalu, Amanda) Modified text on 3/8/2023 (ACH). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ryan Erickson, Sr, Erickson Builders & Co. Inc.. (MMG) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 23-cv-519 NEB/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10112145) filed by Cement Masons, Plasterers and Shophands Service Corporation. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cefalu, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.