Hardy v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
| Mark W. Hardy |
| Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| 0:2023cv00563 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| John R Tunheim |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 6/15/2023. Amended Pleadings due by 6/30/2023. Motions (non-disp) due 11/1/2023. Motions (disp) due by 2/29/2024. Status Conference set for 12/11/2023 at 09:00 AM via Zoom Audio Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Settlement Conference set for 1/10/2024 at 01:00 PM via Video Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 4/24/2023.(TJS)
|
|
Filing 8
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Mark W. Hardy. Jointly Signed by Unum Life Insurance Company of America.(Tataryn, Denise)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR SCHEDULING RECOMMENDATIONS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/18/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 4/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 26(f) Template, #2 Consent Form)(TJS)
|
|
Filing 6
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance)
|
|
Filing 5
Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint filed by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark W. Hardy. Unum Life Insurance Company of America served on 3/10/2023, answer due 3/31/2023. (Tataryn, Denise)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (CLK)
|
|
Filing 2
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 23-cv-563 JRT/JFD.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10125018) filed by Mark W. Hardy. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tataryn, Denise)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hardy v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark W. Hardy | |
| Represented By: | Denise Yegge Tataryn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unum Life Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Terrance J Wagener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
