Urbanek v. Harpstead et al
Petitioner: Edward E. Urbanek
Respondent: Jodi Harpstead and Nancy Johnston
Case Number: 0:2023cv00657
Filed: March 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Dulce J Foster
Referring Judge: Eric C Tostrud
Nature of Suit: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2023 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Edward E. Urbanek re #11 Affidavit in Support, #10 Objection to Report and Recommendations (ACH)
May 15, 2023 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #10 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(ACH)
May 15, 2023 Filing 10 OBJECTION TO #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Edward E. Urbanek. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(ACH)
May 1, 2023 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Edward E. Urbanek, #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Edward E. Urbanek. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 5/1/2023. (JC)
March 31, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Edward E. Urbanek re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #7 Declaration in Support, #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion (ACH) Document QC'd on 4/5/2023 (ABR).
March 31, 2023 Filing 7 Declaration of Edward Urbanek in Support of #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Edward E. Urbanek.(ACH) Document QC'd on 4/5/2023 (ABR).
March 31, 2023 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Edward E. Urbanek.(ACH) Document QC'd on 4/5/2023 (ABR).
March 31, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION FOR Appointment of Counsel filed by Edward E. Urbanek. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ACH) Document QC'd on 4/5/2023 (ABR).
March 31, 2023 Filing 4 RECEIPT number 400001955 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Edward E Urbanek. (ACH) Document QC'd on 4/5/2023 (ABR).
March 20, 2023 Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Edward Urbanek (JGK)
March 17, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Edward E. Urbanek. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud and referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (JGK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Urbanek v. Harpstead et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edward E. Urbanek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jodi Harpstead
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nancy Johnston
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?