Pierce v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Jeffrey Pierce |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 0:2023cv00704 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 6/19/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/19/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 5/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TJB)
|
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint filed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jeffrey Pierce. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 3/27/2023, answer due 5/26/2023. (Karrer, Brenna) |
|
Filing 5
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Brenna Karrer for Jeffrey Pierce. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/24/2023. (KMO)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 23-cv-704 PJS/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Brenna Karrer. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10154370 filed by Jeffrey Pierce. (Schmoll, Zachary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10153054) filed by Jeffrey Pierce. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pierce v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Pierce | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Schmoll |
| Represented By: | Brenna Karrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jake Elrich |
| Represented By: | Terrance J Wagener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
