Murray v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Kevin Murray |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2023cv00711 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement with Defendant by Kevin Murray (Anderson, Timothy) |
Filing 7
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE: The Rule 16 Pretrial Conference that was scheduled for 5/9/2023 is CANCELLED. The Court will issue a Pretrial Scheduling Order based on the parties' Rule 26(f) Report and confidential letters. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 5/2/2023.(TMA)
|
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Kevin Murray. Jointly Signed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Anderson, Timothy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/2/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 5/9/2023 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright.The parties may jointly request that no pretrial conference be held and that the pretrial scheduling order be issued based on the Rule 26(f) Report and confidential settlement letters. The joint request should be emailed along with the copy of the Rule 26(f) Report in Word format to Magistrate Judge Wright at magistrate_wright_chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 4/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Taylor, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-711 DWF/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Taylor, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10154535) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Summons, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Taylor, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murray v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Murray | |
| Represented By: | Timothy S Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua M. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
