Vancosky v. Fortra, LLC
| Tara Hartzel Vancosky |
| Fortra, LLC |
| 0:2023cv00770 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| David T Schultz |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Tara Hartzel Vancosky. Fortra, LLC waiver sent on 4/10/2023, answer due 6/9/2023. (Gudmundson, Brian) Modified text on 4/14/2023 (ABR). |
Filing 6
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. This case is reassigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson and Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz, Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-770 (SRN/DTS). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/31/2023.(ABR)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Tara Hartzel Vancosky of Consolidated, Related Action (Gudmundson, Brian) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Gary E. Mason, Danielle L. Perry, Lisa A. White as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Fortra, LLC. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-770 (PJS/DJF).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fortra, LLC (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10166227) filed by Tara Hartzel Vancosky. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Notice of Data Breach, #2 Exhibit(s) B - GAO Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gudmundson, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vancosky v. Fortra, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tara Hartzel Vancosky | |
| Represented By: | Brian C Gudmundson |
| Represented By: | Michael J Laird |
| Represented By: | Rachel Kristine Tack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fortra, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
