OptumRx, Inc. v. Hahnemann Apothecary, Inc.
OptumRx, Inc. |
Hahnemann Apothecary, Inc. doing business as Hahnemann Apothecary |
0:2023cv00797 |
March 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Jerry W Blackwell |
Leo I Brisbois |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Grant, Michelle) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE by OptumRx, Inc.. Jointly Signed by HAHNEMANN APOTHECARY, INC., d/b/a Hahnemann Apothecary. (Grant, Michelle) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Geoffrey Manson Sigler for OptumRx, Inc..; granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Katherine Maddox Davis for OptumRx, Inc.. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 4/19/2023. (JGK) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Katherine Maddox Davis. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10201983 filed by OptumRx, Inc.. (Grant, Michelle) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Geoffrey M. Sigler. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10201967 filed by OptumRx, Inc.. (Grant, Michelle) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson and Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois for all further proceedings. Judge Donovan W. Frank, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-797 SRN/LIB. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 4/5/2023 and by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/6/23.(kt) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Jerry W. Blackwell recused. Case reassigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 23-cv-797 DWF/ECW. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge Jerry W. Blackwell on 4/3/2023.(ACH) |
Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Geoffrey M. Sigler, Katherine Maddox Davis as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (ACH) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hahnemann Apothecary, Inc.. (ACH) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Jerry W. Blackwell per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-797 JWB/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for OptumRX, Inc.. (Hull, Caitlin) |
Filing 1 PETITION against Hahnemann Apothecary, Inc., d/b/a Hahnemann Apothecary (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10170508) filed by OptumRX, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A and B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hull, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.