Eidem v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Serene Eidem
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 0:2023cv00943
Filed: April 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: John F Docherty
Referring Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER on #10 Stipulation. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. answer due 7/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/5/2023.(TJS)
June 1, 2023 Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation. (Smith, Conor)
June 1, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Jointly Signed by Serene Eidem and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Smith, Conor)
May 15, 2023 Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Wells Fargo is owned 100% by WFC Holdings, LLC. WFC Holdings, LLC is owned 100% by Wells Fargo & Company. Wells Fargo & Company is a publicly-traded corporation on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WFC. Wells Fargo is not aware of any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of Wells Fargo & Companys stock.(Smith, Conor) Modified text on 5/16/2023 (KNK).
May 15, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Conor H.M. Smith on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Smith, Conor)
May 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. answer due 6/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 5/9/2023.(TJS)
May 5, 2023 Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Thomson, Richard)
May 5, 2023 Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, re Extension to June 7, 2023 to Answer or Respond to Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Jointly Signed by Serene Eidem and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Thomson, Richard)
April 26, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Serene Eidem. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. served on 4/17/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Plaster, Bryan)
April 12, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ABR)
April 12, 2023 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 23-cv-943 (PJS/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR)
April 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10197774) filed by Serene Eidem. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Plaster, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eidem v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Serene Eidem
Represented By: John G Albanese
Represented By: Bryan Plaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Conor H.M. Smith
Represented By: Richard T Thomson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?