Coyle v. Equifax Credit Reporting
| Marcus Dwane Coyle |
| Equifax Credit Reporting, Equifax Information and Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 0:2023cv01218 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC answer due 7/6/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 6/21/2023. (jme)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 12
(Text-Only) ORDER. Before the Court is Plaintiff's #10 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Court construes this Motion as a request to update Defendant's name in this action from Equifax Information to Equifax Information Services LLC. Finding that the Clerk of Court has already corrected Defendant's name in the case caption at Plaintiff's request, the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 6/13/2023. (JLD)
|
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings filed by Marcus Dwane Coyle.(MMP) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to AMENDED COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services LLC filed by Marcus Dwane Coyle. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (MMP) Modified text on 6/12/2023 (MMP). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant, Equifax Information Services LLC, shall have up to and including June 20, 2023 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 6/5/2023. (jme)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Equifax Information.(Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading filed by Equifax Information. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Equifax Information. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy Thompson on behalf of Equifax Information. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Equifax Information. filed by Marcus Dwane Coyle. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service) (MMP) Document QC'd on 6/5/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equifax Credit Reporting. Equifax Credit Reporting served on 5/11/2023, answer due 6/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMP) Document QC'd on 5/23/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Equifax Credit Reporting. cc: Marcus Dwane Coyle (JGK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Credit Reporting (filing fee $402, receipt number 4-2221) filed by Marcus Dwane Coyle. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Blank IFP, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) Document QC'd on 5/10/2023 (JGK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
