Brown v. Gorr
| Shawn Brown |
| Sarah Garr and Sarah Gorr |
| 0:2023cv01389 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(ACH) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. Brown's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Brown is restricted from initiating new litigation in this District unless represented by counsel or authorized by a judicial officer of this District. This restriction is imposed until July 5, 2023. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 5/23/2023. (KMW)
|
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT filed by Shawn Brown.(ABR) Document QC'd on 5/24/2023 (MKB). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Shawn Brown. (MMP) Document QC'd on 5/24/2023 (MKB). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sarah Gorr filed by Shawn Brown. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 5th Division Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) cc: Brown (MMP) Modified text on 5/18/2023 (MMP). Document QC'd on 5/24/2023 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
