Roberts et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Mr. James Roberts, Alecxavier Johnson and James Roberts |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 0:2023cv01422 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Paul A Magnuson |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Farganis, Dion) |
| Filing 12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Farganis, Dion) |
Filing 11
ORDER on #9 Stipulation. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due July 12, 2023. The parties may not stipulate away a Court deadline such as a response to a motion to dismiss. Should Defendant file a motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs require additional time to file a response, they can seek that additional time from the Court. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 6/29/2023. (ALT)
|
| Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 Stipulation. (Farganis, Dion) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and for Plaintiffs to Respond to a Rule 12 Motion by United Parcel Service, Inc.. Jointly Signed by James Roberts and Alexcavier Johnson. (Farganis, Dion) |
| Filing 8 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Michelle L. Duncan and Brooke F. Poling as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMP) |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (Farganis, Dion) Modified text on 6/29/2023 (MMP). |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and for Plaintiffs to Respond to a Rule 12 Motion by United Parcel Service, Inc.. Jointly Signed by John Roberts and Alecxavier Johnson. (Farganis, Dion) Modified text on 6/29/2023 (MMP). |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Alecxavier Johnson, James Roberts re #4 Summons Issued (Nelson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service, Inc.. (ACH) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 23-cv-1422 PAM/DLM.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. filed by James Roberts, Alecxavier Johnson. (Nelson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10283565) filed by James Roberts, Alecxavier Johnson. Filer requests summons issued. ATTACHMENT FILED IN ERROR - (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nelson, Nicholas) Modified text on 5/18/2023 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
