Khidir et al v. Swanson et al
| Akam Arib Khidir, Amira Arib Khidir, Mohammed Arib Khidir, Madyan Arib Khidir and Arib Khidir Hamad Ameen |
| Trina Swanson, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Trina M. Swanson |
| 0:2023cv01507 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1421 Immigration: Naturalization Authority |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Liles Harvey Repp on behalf of All Defendants. (Repp, Liles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Trina Swanson. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (6th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 23-cv-1507 ECT/LIB.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Trina Swanson (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10295213) filed by Mohammed Arib Khidir, Amira Arib Khidir, Akam Arib Khidir, Madyan Arib Khidir, Arib Khidir Hamad Ameen. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
