Schwartzman et al v. United States of America et al
| Jon Schwartzman and Jane Greenstein |
| United States of America and Daniel Werfel |
| 0:2023cv01550 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 Quiet Title |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Jon Schwartzman, Jane Greenstein. United States of America served on 5/25/2023, answer due 7/24/2023; Daniel Werfel served on 5/25/2023, answer due 7/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States of America, Daniel Werfel. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Federal Tax Suits) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 23-cv-1550 (KMM/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States, Daniel Werfel (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10301902) filed by Jon Schwartzman, Jane Greenstein. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
