Doward v. City of Kettle River
| Monique Annette Doward |
| City of Kettle River |
| 0:2023cv01798 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER: See Notice and Order for document submission deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 8/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 The Case for Aggressive Civility, #2 Consent Form)(JLB)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT filed by Monique Annette Doward. (Doward, Monique) Modified text on 8/11/2023 (kt). |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint filed by City of Kettle River. (Fleming-Wolfe, Julie) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monique Annette Doward. City of Kettle River served on 7/20/2023. (MMP) |
| Filing 8 Clerk's Notice of APPLICATION FOR PRO SE LITIGANT TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Monique Annette Doward is GRANTED e-filing privileges in this case. Pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 5 and 7(d), Monique Annette Doward has consented to electronic service and has agreed to waive service by other means for all subsequent filings in this case, except when electronic service is not allowed under the rules. (KMO) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie Anne Fleming-Wolfe on behalf of City of Kettle River. (Fleming-Wolfe, Julie) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBIT re #5 Summons Returned Executed filed by Monique Annette Doward.(MMP) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monique Annette Doward. City of Kettle River served on 8/1/2023, answer due 8/22/2023. (MMP) Modified text on 8/3/2023 (MMP). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Kettle River. cc: Doward w/ Information Sheet #2. (CLK) Modified text on 7/12/2023 (CLK). |
| Filing 3 RECEIPT number 76446522825 in the amount of $402.00 issued to Monique A. Doward. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Monique Annette Doward (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Kettle River filed by Monique Annette Doward. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 5th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Addendum, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doward v. City of Kettle River | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monique Annette Doward | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Kettle River | |
| Represented By: | Julie Anne Fleming-Wolfe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
