Wilson v. Ramsey County et al
| Edward Wilson |
| Ramsey County, Medical Department and Department of Justice |
| 0:2023cv01991 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| John R Tunheim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Prisoner Complaint filed by Edward Wilson. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 8/16/2023. (ALM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE re #3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Edward Wilson. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 7/17/2023. (ALM)
|
|
Filing 3
Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Edward Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MKB) Document QC'd on 7/28/2023 (MMG).
|
|
Filing 2
LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Edward Wilson (jam)
|
|
Filing 1
42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against Department of Justice, Medical Department, Ramsey County filed by Edward Wilson. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jam)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
