Coronado et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Ada Coronado and Victor Coronado Garza |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick B. Garland |
| 0:2023cv02059 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| John R Tunheim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Friedrich A. P. Siekert on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Siekert, Friedrich) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 23-cv-2059 JRT/LIB.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10396689) filed by Ada Coronado, Victor Coronado Garza. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits A & B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Kantor, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
