Johnson et al v. Reed et al
Paul Edward Johnson, Marcie Henning and Nada Van Asch |
Franklin Reed, Todrick Barnette, Scott Jerry Seiler, Seiler Law Firm and State of Minnesota |
0:2023cv02130 |
July 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Patrick J Schiltz |
David T Schultz |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Nada Van Asch (jam) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Marcie Henning (jam) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Paul Edward Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(jam) |
Filing 2 NOTICE for CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND REQUESTED by Nada Van Asch, Marcie Henning, Paul Edward Johnson (jam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Todrick Barnette, Franklin Reed, Scott Jerry Seiler, Seiler Law Firm, State of Minnesota filed by Nada Van Asch, Marcie Henning, Paul Edward Johnson. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.