Jackson v. Hennepin County Department of Human Services & Public Health et al
| Nadia Jackson |
| Hennepin County Department of Human Services & Public Health, Lili Ose Msimbe, Shelby Dore, Hannah Burton and Hennepin County Human Resources |
| 0:2023cv02213 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Paul A Magnuson |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MMP) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs and DISMISSING this matter without prejudice. (Written Opinion.) Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 8/23/2023. (ALT)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Nadia Jackson. (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hannah Burton, Shelby Dore, Hennepin County Department of Human Services & Public Health, Hennepin County Human Resources, Lili Ose Msimbe filed by Nadia Jackson. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jam) Document QC'd on 8/7/2023 (DLO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
