PNC Bank, National Association v. One Stop Center, Inc. et al
| PNC Bank, National Association |
| One Stop Center, Inc. and Ahmed Jama |
| 0:2023cv02245 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ahmed Jama, One Stop Center, Inc.. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 23-cv-2245 PJS/TNL.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10436659) filed by PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wagener, Terrance) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
