Mosqueda v. Progress Software Corporation et al
| Rosemary Mosqueda |
| Progress Software Corporation and Pension Benefit Information, LLC doing business as PBI Research Services |
| 0:2023cv02278 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| David T Schultz |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Rosemary Mosqueda. Progress Software Corporation waiver sent on 8/17/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (DeSanto, Mark) |
Filing 12
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/17/2023. Associated Cases: 0:23-cv-02028-KMM-DTS et al.(TJB)
|
|
Filing 11
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Claudia D McCarron for Pension Benefit Information, LLC.; granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Paulyne Gardner for Pension Benefit Information, LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/8/2023. (KMO)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Paulyne Gardner. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10454806 filed by Pension Benefit Information, LLC. (Sugisaka, Keiko) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Claudia McCarron. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10454776 filed by Pension Benefit Information, LLC. (Sugisaka, Keiko) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Keiko L Sugisaka on behalf of Pension Benefit Information, LLC. (Sugisaka, Keiko) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Rosemary Mosqueda. Pension Benefit Information, LLC waiver sent on 8/3/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (Drake, E) |
|
Filing 6
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Mark B DeSanto for Rosemary Mosqueda. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/3/2023. (jam)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mark B. DeSanto. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10445721 filed by Rosemary Mosqueda. (Drake, E) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Mark B. DeSanto as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pension Benefit Information, LLC, Progress Software Corporation. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Related Cases Non-MDL list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 23-cv-2278 (KMM/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pension Benefit Information, LLC d/b/a PBI Research Services, Progress Software Corporation (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10444731) filed by Rosemary Mosqueda. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Drake, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
