Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Blueberry Bowl, LLC
| Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company |
| Blueberry Bowl, LLC |
| 0:2023cv02430 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC.(Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 13 Declaration of Brock P. Alton in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 4)(Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 11 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #9 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC.(Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3A (STP) before Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (Alton, Brock) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #3 Complaint, filed by Blueberry Bowl, LLC filed by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Kovacs, James) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Blueberry Bowl, LLC. (MKB) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (5th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 23-cv-2430 (KMM/LIB).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Blueberry Bowl, LLC (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10467134) filed by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, # DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-WILL REFILE. (7) Civil Cover Sheet) (Kovacs, James) Modified text on 8/11/2023 (MKB). |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Kovacs, James) |
| Filing 1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-DIRECTED TO FILE COMPLAINT. RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company states that Midwest Family Advantage Insurance Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Defendant Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. Midwest Family Advantage Insurance Company does not have a pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case and has no connection or interest in the present litigation. (Kovacs, James) Modified text on 8/11/2023 (MMP). Modified text on 8/11/2023 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
