Contreras v. Barker et al
| Rocky Mel Contreras |
| J Barker and Hennipen County Medical Center |
| 0:2023cv02500 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SUBPOENA by Rocky Mel Contreras. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(kt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, filed by Rocky Mel Contreras. (MKB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of updated contact number by Rocky Mel Contreras. (MKB) Document QC'd on 10/3/2023 (JME). |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff's action required within 21 days. See Order for Details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 9/8/2023. (MEH)
|
| Filing 3 Waiver filed by Rocky Mel Contreras. (MMG) Documents QC'd on 9/12/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Rocky Mel Contreras. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(MKB) Document QC'd on 8/23/2023 (DLO). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J Barker, Hennipen County Medical Center filed by Rocky Mel Contreras. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (MKB) Document QC'd on 8/23/2023 (DLO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
