Caerus Corp. v. ICON Medical, LLC
Caerus Corp. doing business as Orthocor Medical |
ICON Medical LLC and ICON Medical, LLC |
0:2023cv02624 |
August 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Douglas L Micko |
Patrick J Schiltz |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 AMENDED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Caerus Corp.. ICON Medical, LLC served on 9/13/2023. (Archer, David) |
Filing 17 (Text-Only) ORDER: Due to the pending Motion to Dismiss #12 , the Court finds there is good cause to delay the entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The Court will schedule a pretrial conference, if needed, promptly after a decision is issued on the pending motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 10/4/2023. (jme) |
Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General or in the alternative for a more definite statement filed by ICON Medical, LLC.(Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General or in the alternative for a more definite statement filed by ICON Medical, LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 14 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #12 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by ICON Medical, LLC.(Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General or in the alternative for a more definite statement : Motion Hearing set for 12/4/2023 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 15 (MPLS) before Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz. (Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss/General or in the alternative for a more definite statement filed by ICON Medical, LLC. (Pelikan, Matthew). Added MOTION for More Definite Statement on 10/4/2023 (CLK). |
Filing 11 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for ICON Medical, LLC. (Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J.M. Pelikan on behalf of ICON Medical, LLC. (Pelikan, Matthew) |
Filing 9 EXHIBIT 1 re #7 Amended Complaint filed by Caerus Corp.. (Johnson, Jason) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to ICON Medical, LLC. (MKB) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ICON Medical LLC. filed by Caerus Corp.. No summons requested. (Johnson, Jason) Modified text on 9/7/2023 (CLK). |
Filing 6 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADEQUATELY PLEAD SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION within 14 days of this Order's date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 8/28/2023. (JLD) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Caerus Corp.. (Johnson, Jason) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ICON Medical LLC. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 23-cv-2624 (PJS/DLM).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ICON Medical LLC (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10495493) filed by Caerus Corp. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.