Econ Control, Inc. v. Fresh Smoke of MN LLC et al
| Econ Control, Inc. d/b/a CertiFresh Cigar and Econ Control, Inc. doing business as CertiFresh Cigar |
| Fresh Smoke of MN LLC and Brian Berken |
| 0:2023cv02716 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. filed by Econ Control, Inc.. No summons requested. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC.(Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 15 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #11 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC.(Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 14 Declaration of O. Joseph Balthazor Jr. in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #11 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 1/3/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 13W (MPLS) before Judge Nancy E. Brasel. (Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Econ Control, Inc.. Fresh Smoke of MN LLC served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (Herman, Alex) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Econ Control, Inc. Brian Berken served on 9/8/2023, answer due 9/29/2023.(Herman, Alex) Modified text on 9/29/2023 (CLK). Modified text on 9/29/2023 (CLK). |
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron G Thomas on behalf of Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Thomas, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by O. Joseph Balthazor, Jr on behalf of Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Balthazor, O.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Weber on behalf of Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (Weber, Jordan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Copyright, Trademark list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 23-cv-2716 NEB/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Econ Control, Inc. d/b/a CertiFresh Cigar. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian Berken, Fresh Smoke of MN LLC (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10515994) filed by Econ Control, Inc. d/b/a CertiFresh Cigar. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Parker, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
