Tizoc v. Rardin
| Jose Luis Tizoc |
| Jared Rardin |
| 0:2023cv02819 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 LETTER REFERRING Litigant to FBA Pro Se Project from Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. (AEF) |
Filing 12
ORDER in Response to #6 Respondent's Request to Extend Time to Respond to Petitioner's petition. Respondent shall have up to and including November 14, 2023, to respond to the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 10/30/2023. (AEF)
|
| Filing 11 EXHIBIT re #10 MOTION for Addendum/for Time Credit filed by Jose Luis Tizoc.(MMG) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Addendum/for Time Credit filed by Jose Luis Tizoc. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMG) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER in Response to #6 Respondent's Request to Extend Time to Respond to Petitioner's petition. Respondent's response is due 11/14/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 10/24/2023. (AEF)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jared Rardin re #6 Request, #7 Proposed Order to Judge - Other (Peterson, Emily) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Request. (Peterson, Emily) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Extend Time to Respond to Petition by Jared Rardin. (Peterson, Emily) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Respondent is directed to file an answer to Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus within 28 days of this Order. If Petitioner intends to file a reply to Respondent's answer, he must do so within 21 days of the date when the answer is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 9/26/2023. (AEF)
|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT number 400003485 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Jose Tizoc. (ABR). Document QC'd- Modified text on 10/11/2023 (LTT). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily M Peterson on behalf of Jared Rardin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peterson, Emily) |
| Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Jose Luis Tizoc (jam) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Luis Tizoc. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd, 4th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (jam). Document QC'd-Modified text on 10/3/2023 (LTT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tizoc v. Rardin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Luis Tizoc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jared Rardin | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | Emily M Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
