Gradert et al v. DTY Hospitality, LLC et al
Katelyn Gradert and Cody Gradert |
DTY Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality, LLC and William Kyle Roberts |
0:2023cv02854 |
September 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Douglas L Micko |
Wilhelmina M Wright |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MKB) |
Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without costs or disbursements awarded to any party. LET JUDGEMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 9/21/2023.(RMM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cody Gradert, Katelyn Gradert (Rubish, Renee) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DTY Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality, LLC, William Kyle Roberts. (CLK) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. Please use case number 23-cv-2854 WMW/DLM.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CLK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10538884) filed by Katelyn Gradert. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rubish, Renee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.